Lords Re-un Equal Opportunities Bill
A number of clubs have asked for an update after reading
stories in the press concerning an Equal Opportunities Bill relating
to Private Members Clubs.
The Equal Opportunities Bill was debated in the House
of Lords under the auspices of Lord Faulkener of Worcester. It passed
through all the stages of the House of Lords but did not get sufficient
time in the last sesion of the House of Commons to make further
progress. In Parliamentary terms it therefore died.
Lord Lester and Lord Faulkener have just introduced
another Bill int he House of Lords. Their premise for the Bill will
be exactly the same as the first one - that single sex clubs should
remain as currently constituted. Clubs of either sex, however, which
allow members of the opposite sex to attend the club on a regular
basis should not treat them any differently.
Consequently any Union club that has women with limited
rights would be caught by this legislation if it ever became law.
Any club that takes a subscription from women or admits them on
a regular basis on a ladies card would find that they would be forced,
after having been in existence for two years, to treat women in
the same way as men. They would therefore have to charge the same
subscriptions, permit woment to vote for committee, attend the Annual
General Meeting and be elected as Officers of the club.
This issue was again raised by Lord Faulkener during
the debate on the Licensing Bill in the House of Lords. The Government
stated that they were very sympathetic to Lord Faulkener's view
but felt it should not be a part of a Bill concerning licensing
and therefore it will not be included in the Licensing Bill. They
did, however, state that they were hoping to produce some legislation
in the not too distant future relating to private members' social
clubs. This, of course, would equally apply to golf clubs and gentlemen's
clubs in London that permit women as well as working men's and other
social clubs.
Recently a Ten-Minute Bill has been introduced in
the House of Commons. It is unlikely that this will proceed but
again the Government have made supportive noises.
It is therefore becoming obvious to the Union's Executive
that there is a determination from a number of Parliamentarians
across the political spectrum that women should be treated equally
to men in private members' clubs. There are only about ten single
sex clubs in the Union. These are clubs that never allow women on
the premises except as employees.
The Government seem to be pressurised into supporting
it and have stated that they are in basic agreement with the principle
of equal rights. It is therefore almost certain that within the
next couple of years a Bill which has the Government's support,
or is even sponsored by the Government themselves, will be on the
Statute Book and then all clubs will be forced to give women full
rights.
The Executive will naturally continue to monitor the
situation and provide future reports.
May 2003
|